However, a friend using Pentax complained the Pentax Lab 3 sucks and loss a lot of details. In that comparision, he compared it with Silkpix, but un-sharpen mask was applied when he use the Silkpix program. So that is not a good comparision.
I don't have Silkpix, so I just do a quick test Against Photoshop CS. Below is the 100% crop of a screen shot, side by side comparsion:
Camera: Pentax istD
Lens: Sigma 105/2.8 EX DG macro
Camera setting: all parameters set to "0"
RAW conversion settings: all use camera setting, ie: no tuning.
*CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12332/123326c1d23cf5c32212518ee86b21fc880ec26b" alt=""
I don't find any difference in terms of sharpness. The color, as I experienced before, is that Photoshop gave a cooler color tone, but that's easy to correct in the parameters of Photoshop RAW conversion.
One final note: the image responsed very well to un-sharp mask filter in Photoshop, and does not show much artifices even with aggressive setting. It's very 'processable' in short.
1 comment:
I use CS2. In your example, CS2 has more detail? Thanks again for your report, nice.
Post a Comment